Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Main Menu
Search
Tasmanian Linux Users Group Forum Index
   The Penguin Lounge
     A bit disheartend
Register To Post

Threaded | Newest First Previous Topic | Next Topic | Bottom
Poster Thread
ensignr
Posted on: 2005/9/27 0:57
Just popping in
Joined: 2005/9/26
From:
Posts: 4
A bit disheartend
OK firstly I'd like to thank Czaxx for the recent radio interview. I found it very informative, especially when he answered all my million and one questions I posed to him.

Having finally found a solution to one of the things that had been stopping me giving linux another go I thought I'd try linux out one more time. The Problem was resizing my NTFS partition so as to install linux, the solution was a self booting Ubanutu DVD (thanks APC) and ntfsresize.

So having downloaded the Fedora Core 4 DVD9 iso I finally bit the bullet and installed it on the weekend.

Unfortunately I'd have to say I am still disappointed with what I ended with.

While I had no problems with the whole process of resizing my NTFS partition after that the process seemed to go downhill.

Everything seemed to install OK and actually the whole installation process was a bit of a breeze. Anaconda seems to me to be a great installer. However, upon the completion of installation process and rebooting the system I encountered a problem with the 'firstboot' programme.

The mouse didn't seem to be getting the correct window focus. I had a cursor, but clicking on any button didn't yield any results. I pressed on using the keyboard shortcuts until the audio test where a popup dialog took the away, and didn't return, the keyboard focus to the main screen. I could no longer use the keyboard shortcut to get to the next screen and was forced to hit the reset button.

The second time it booted and ran the firstboot programme it worked OK, so at that stage I wasn't too worried.

The second problem I had was probably more my fault than anything else, but wasn't helped by the lack of any sort of notification icon; I know it's not Windows, get over it.

I couldn't figure out why my connection to my ADSL modem wasnt working. I did eventually though. My problem was I was setting up the wrong network adapter. I have two adapters, one onboard and one on a PCI card. Currently I only have the onboard one connected, and I was setting up the NIC. I just assumed the system would assign eth0 to the onboard and not the NIC, silly me. As I said it was my fault, but the viege error messages and the lack of any system tray like icons didn't make it easy to diagnose.

Then came the problem which made me stop using linux many years ago. Installation packages. I always seem to have a problem with them. IMHO they've been a problem for a long time and something that I would have hoped would be 'fixed' by now, and certainly need to be in order for linux to become a serious contender as a mainstream OS platform.

RPM Packages just dont seem install correctly; well certainly not all the time.

Upon Czaxx's 'radio' advise I tried installing AMSN, it all seemed to be going smoothly until a dependancy required it to install a package from the Fedora Core DVD. The DVD wasnt in the drive and I hit the OK button in the dialog requesting it before it had completely spun up. This produced an error saying there was an problem with the installation.

Subsequent attempts to reinstall the package gave me the message that AMSN was already installed, although it wouldnt load from the Applications menu. I eventually did the newbie thing and reinstalled the entire OS again, then AMSN, this time with the FC disc in the drive. This time it installed without a hitch.

Then to top it off, in order to log in to the messenger service securely I need to install yet another piece of software, TLS, which AMSN kindly downloaded, but I am blowed if I can get it to install.

I also had issues installing the Real Player, which I still can't get to run or reinstall.

Which brings me to another point. What sort of OS these days needs you to install additional software just to play a mpeg movie? Codecs perhaps, but not an entire programme. I would have thought Helix or Totem would be at least able to play them.

Sure it all looks pretty these days, but I can't see that many of the problems I had years ago have changed one iota. I am certainly glad I went for a dual boot machine, keeping XP on my PC instead of doing what I considered and wiping the drive to put linux on.

I certianly shouldnt be having thse sorts of issues. I did Computer Systems Engineering in which we used linux (shell only) pretty heavily. Sure it was a hell of a long time ago, but if I can't get things working as they should, how the heck can the 'average Joe'?

Don't get me wrong I am all for Open Source software, and loath Bill and his evil empire just as much as the next guy. One of the smartest things I did this year was move over to Firefox and Thunderbird and I've been using The GIMP for a very long time. However it's been quite a number of years since I've had a play with linux, cartman was the last build I used, and to me not much seems to have changed. Well with the exception of better driver support, which is certainly a good thing.

All that said I'd be more than happy for someone to point out that I am doing something majorly wrong or that I should try another distribution.

</rant>
gareth
Posted on: 2005/9/27 12:59
Webmaster
Joined: 2005/2/9
From: Launceston
Posts: 60
Re: A bit disheartend
Hey ensignr.
I just had to reply to this old chestnut :)
I totally sympathise with the frustration you're obviously feeling.
'Stupid computers'
That said...
I have a range of opinions of who/what/when/where/why/which Gnu/Linux/FLOSS.

My experience has been similar to yours in that I thought I wanted to find a Distro which would 'just work'. I'm coming to realise that nothing could be further from the truth.

My first and dearest Linux box was Trustix 1.5 console only and it was a fine mailserver and apache box for hosting my business site. Now there was some steep learning.

In the last couple of years I've installed/nuked SuSE/Mandrake/RedHat/ and Twenty other combos. The mainstay for a desktop and server has been Debian due to its
'Purity'/package management/standardisation. It still however needs to be beaten into submission to get it to do what I actually want as opposed to settling for the closest alternative option.

Now every distro I've ever installed (with one exception; coming to that...) has had some MAJOR show stopping FUBAR that has either led me to endless hours of 'research >> trial >> error' or just nuking it because I refuse to believe that something can be that useless 5min into first use.

Man software can really suck.

The problem is the sheer volume/range/type of software available to the humble unknowing user ("What is this Linux thing anyway?").

The Distro chooses Gnome >> you need K3b
The Distro chooses Enlightend Sound Daemon(ESD) >> you need alsa
The Distro changes devfs to udev without telling you during an uprade >> you reboot and the kernel can't find your drives
The Distro can't possibly wear enough hats to take care of all the dependencies of all the packages (10000 of them)

The Distro fails "Everything to everyone".

I have recently been saying nice things about Ubuntu. I still am but there is a Distro that encompasses the flaws mentioned above. Ubuntu will be really really great very very soon, but not yet. Ubuntu comes with Gnome and that's cool but Gnomebaker(or gcombust?) can't hold a candle to K3b as yet. I have had to do major surgery on the default Ubuntu install to make it solid enough for normal humans to use. The minute you start straying from the Distro's path you end up in Distro-me land. No-one can help you and you're making a Frankenstein that might never get the love it wants.

Solution!!!!!!!!!!!:

Nah. Rant first. then Solution...

Windows is fine for most people. It is.
Humans use computers for:
Web Browsing
Email
Word processing
Games
Downloding stuff
Printing things
and maybe a little music or dvd copying
etc.

BUT...

The Windows that most commonly gets compared to Linux is the Geeks Windows XP PRO box with Photoshop && OFFICE 2003 && NERO 6 && Macromedia MX && && && you get my point...

The WinCrackBox is teh win! Why? mmm um... $20K worth of software?

Windows comes with Wordpad, you can't unrar/burn sensibly/ codecs anyone?/ etc.
Now I can tell you that your Hardley Normal shopper gets that box home plugs in the modem clicks all the buttons, rings ISP support, finally gets it working and ~1-3months later they have a messy compromised box with inappropriate popups etc...

That Windows box came preinstalled and with the very bare minimum of functionality. With a bit of planing and some cautionary words about all-in-one printer purchasing I can do the same and better for my clients under Linux. Or buy a mac.

Now back to the Geek Linux box.
We want it all right?

K. Well. For a dual booter I recommend only ever having a second HDD for Linux. If you use Grub(you should) then you can install your Linux Distro on one drive and have a Grub enty pointing to Windows on your other drive, that way you will never nuke your Windows and if you ever need to do a Repair Reinstall you won't nuke your Grub MBR.

Choose the Distro with the best documentation.

Solution: Gentoo.

Next year I will probably be singing the praises of Linux From Scratch.

I've had the most success with Gentoo, all 3 weeks of it.

You basically just install what you know you want.
The package manager is basically a bunch of scripts so you may be surprised to find such package entries as doom3/tribes2/ut2004/cedega which makes it very handy to install your legally purchased non-linux games.

And the old Gnome v. KDE pffft! Fluxbox.
Fluxbox is the only one that doesn't install buckets of programmes that i really don't need. What do you want your window manager to actually 'do' anyway?

Command Line Interface(CLI):
Try rtorrent for a bittorent client; ncurses interface, it uses next-to-no resources and if you use the programme 'screen' from the command line you can detach the process and reattach it again from any terminal with 'screen -r'

It took me 48hrs to install Gentoo. I've got all the funtionality I want and now I've even got Halflife-Steam working. I've had some showstoppers and some screaming but everything has come together in the end.

The only way I got here is because it's taken me a while to figure out what I want from Linux:
Hardware recognition >> Kernel options or Kernel Modules.
Simplicity >> I've tried lots and lots of programmes, now I can just install the ones I use.


Everything IS a project in Linux, but basically thats what I want.

#Bugger gotta go to work...
#


----------------
There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion.

Sir Francis Bacon (1561 - 1626)

Czaxx
Posted on: 2005/9/27 13:46
Webmaster
Joined: 2005/3/17
From: Hobart
Posts: 107
Re: A bit disheartend
OK, I'll try and answer these problems:

Quote:

ensignr wrote:

Then came the problem which made me stop using linux many years ago. Installation packages. I always seem to have a problem with them. IMHO they've been a problem for a long time and something that I would have hoped would be 'fixed' by now, and certainly need to be in order for linux to become a serious contender as a mainstream OS platform.

RPM Packages just dont seem install correctly; well certainly not all the time.

Upon Czaxx's 'radio' advise I tried installing AMSN, it all seemed to be going smoothly until a dependancy required it to install a package from the Fedora Core DVD. The DVD wasnt in the drive and I hit the OK button in the dialog requesting it before it had completely spun up. This produced an error saying there was an problem with the installation.

Subsequent attempts to reinstall the package gave me the message that AMSN was already installed, although it wouldnt load from the Applications menu. I eventually did the newbie thing and reinstalled the entire OS again, then AMSN, this time with the FC disc in the drive. This time it installed without a hitch.


Ok a few issues here:
The installation of packages and dependencies is best handled by package managers such as Synaptic (or urpmi on Mandriva systems). These package managers handle dependencies, etc. and make software installation fairly seamless. However, there will always be times on any OS where a software installation fails for whatever reason - the solution on Linux as on Windows is simple: uninstall the program and re-install it, re-intalling the operating system for a failed software install is really using a sledgehammer to crack a walnut. All the package managers have uninstall facilities, or alternatively a rpm -e <name-of-package> will do the trick (on rpm distros).

Quote:


Then to top it off, in order to log in to the messenger service securely I need to install yet another piece of software, TLS, which AMSN kindly downloaded, but I am blowed if I can get it to install.


We need more information here if you need help - what sort of file did it download? My guess would be that if amsn downloaded it then it would be a source package which needs to be compiled. Its easier just to use a package manager to install TLS.

The reason that it is a separate piece of software is becuase the amsn guys want to program an msn client - not security software, some other guys are already doing that, therefore its more efficient that they use this third party software. The unix philosophy is generally "one tool, one job" so its frequent that you'll find that to add some types of functions that are not neccessarily the core focus of the project, third-party software will be required. Package managers ease this - either by downloading them as dependencies or providing an easy mechanism by which the software can be installed.

Quote:

I also had issues installing the Real Player, which I still can't get to run or reinstall.

Again we'll need more info to be able to help you out here - what were the issues that you had? Any error messages?
For memory the last time I installed rplayer it was just a basic rpm file. Many package repositories (accessable by a package manager such as Synaptic) have realplayer packaged for your distro.

Quote:

Which brings me to another point. What sort of OS these days needs you to install additional software just to play a mpeg movie? Codecs perhaps, but not an entire programme. I would have thought Helix or Totem would be at least able to play them.


Totem will play basic mpegs out-of-the-box (although I'd suggest mplayer for all your media playing goodness - apologies to xine fans out there :) ) but many distros are afraid to distribute codec packs because of legal issues (for memory Red Hat didn't even ship mp3 capabilities becuase of patent issues) - generally codec packs are available from package repositories that are hosted in jurisdictions with saner IP laws.

If you are annoyed by this situation then a letter to your local MP outlining why software patents are wrong is about the best you can do.

Quote:

Sure it all looks pretty these days, but I can't see that many of the problems I had years ago have changed one iota. I am certainly glad I went for a dual boot machine, keeping XP on my PC instead of doing what I considered and wiping the drive to put linux on.


Yep, it is pretty but I'm afraid I'm going to have to disagree with you on the problems front. Software installation using package managers is painless. There are tons of software repositories out there with practically everything you need. Synaptic, YUM, urpmi and the venerable apt-get make life extremely easy on the software installation front (for memory, Fedora comes with Synaptic as its package manager). If you were using rpm on the command-line to install packages you were using the wrong tool for the job - rpm is for installing/uninstalling and managing distro packages - its is very bad at doing anything else, thats why package managers are used to install third party stuff.

Quote:

I certianly shouldnt be having thse sorts of issues. I did Computer Systems Engineering in which we used linux (shell only) pretty heavily. Sure it was a hell of a long time ago, but if I can't get things working as they should, how the heck can the 'average Joe'?


Everyone has problems moving to a new system by virtue of the fact that it is different. I find it difficult to get BSD boxes to do what I want on occasion - because they are different- even though its still a unix variant. Its a matter of approaching the system logically and asking lots of questions - even though I know linux pretty well - there's no point in getting annoyed with it.

There are plenty of good internet resources that will help you nut out just about anything and, of course, there are some pretty knowledgable people on this site and on the mailing list that will help you - ask lots of questions.

Quote:

All that said I'd be more than happy for someone to point out that I am doing something majorly wrong or that I should try another distribution.

</rant>

Ok, no prob - as I said make sure you are using the right tool for the job - package mangers are the thing to use to install software, they handle dependencies, etc and make life easy.

The problem you identified with the network card - well, basically there was not really an error, the wrong netwrok card was selected. You noted that you assumed that eth0 would be assigned to the correct card - 1st rule of computers: assume nothing. I've had plenty of grief with Windows selecting the wrong card, disabling cards for no apparent reason and just generally being a PIA about networking, so Linux is not alone :) I think these are just platform independent problems. That being said, many of the desktop distros do have network indicator applets - Mandriva has one installed by default which is kind of like the windows taskbar icons for networking.

The problem with 'firstboot' - well, it fixed itself on reboot. How many times is this the fix for a problem on any platform :) ? Thankfully 99% of the time on linux when an app stops working its a matter of restarting the service rather than the whole box, but sometimes a restart is the only way.

The problem with media players? well, Media players will always be a problem on Linux until sanity prevails in the IP field. This is not a linux problem, its a political/legal one. That being said, with the right codecs installed I've never had a file that mplayer can't play.

As far as your choice of distro - I'd go for a more desktop oriented one: Kubuntu (or ubuntu) or Mandriva - Fedora is more workstation oriented, but its by no means a bad choice.

Hope all that helps, remember ranting doesn't usually get you much help in any community but asking good questions does.

Cheers,

Czaxx
ensignr
Posted on: 2005/9/27 14:04
Just popping in
Joined: 2005/9/26
From:
Posts: 4
Re: A bit disheartend
Hey Gareth, thanks for your reply.

After having a bit more of a poke around this forum last night and reading your post regarding Ubanutu I was intending on giving that a go, with your recommended packages of course. I just need to get a blank CD to burn the ISO to as I don't have one atm.

What do I want from Linux? Something that works. I don't mind having to fiddle around a bit to get it all working, although as I said most people wouldnt, which is something thats holding Linux back IMHO.

I also want something that will run much better than XP does on my other PC, which is a lowly PII MXX with 80MB of RAM. For that I am probably going to go for DSL, as it apparently runs of 16MB. I just want to reaquaint myself with Linux first as I'll have to wipe that drive on that machine inorder to put Linux on.

I agree that Windows certainly does have it's problems, the ammount of tug it pulls on your purse stings is certainly one of them. Especially with a new Vista on the horizon - pardon the pun - where M$ will probably get up to the same tricks they have with W2K; ie make new versions of software like Media Player and MSN Messenger not work correctly under older versions of their OS.

I am certain I will eventually get things working the way that I want to, I just wish it wasn't so difficult.

cheers


btw. I would have worn the Tux suit
ensignr
Posted on: 2005/9/27 15:14
Just popping in
Joined: 2005/9/26
From:
Posts: 4
Re: A bit disheartend
Cheers Czaxx,

Quote:

The installation of packages and dependencies is best handled by package managers such as Synaptic (or urpmi on Mandriva systems). These package managers handle dependencies, etc. and make software installation fairly seamless. However, there will always be times on any OS where a software installation fails for whatever reason - the solution on Linux as on Windows is simple: uninstall the program and re-install it, re-intalling the operating system for a failed software install is really using a sledgehammer to crack a walnut. All the package managers have uninstall facilities, or alternatively a rpm -e <name-of-package> will do the trick (on rpm distros).


I did scan the Gnome menus for some sort of package manager, and even the Run Program command, but apart from the Add/Remove Programs in the System Settings menu I couldnt find anything, and I dont think two mentioned programs were there.

Yes I did also try rpm, but as you said it wasnt the correct tool so no wonder it didnt work. Using yum on the command line also failed to install TSL.


Quote:

We need more information here if you need help - what sort of file did it download? My guess would be that if amsn downloaded it then it would be a source package which needs to be compiled. Its easier just to use a package manager to install TLS.


From the list of choices it gave me I chose Linux for i386, which seemed like the only choice that really applied to me. I also tried looking for a TLS package using Red Hats Up2date service as well as on their website; which only yielded something a 'plugin' for Apache, something I didn't think was appropriate as I didn't put Apache on. Well not yet anyway.


Quote:

The reason that it is a separate piece of software is becuase the amsn guys want to program an msn client - not security software, some other guys are already doing that, therefore its more efficient that they use this third party software. The unix philosophy is generally "one tool, one job" so its frequent that you'll find that to add some types of functions that are not neccessarily the core focus of the project, third-party software will be required. Package managers ease this - either by downloading them as dependencies or providing an easy mechanism by which the software can be installed.


You won't get any arguments from me there. Makes perfect sence and its the reason why most programs under Linux are considerably smaller.


Quote:

Again we'll need more info to be able to help you out here - what were the issues that you had? Any error messages?
For memory the last time I installed rplayer it was just a basic rpm file. Many package repositories (accessable by a package manager such as Synaptic) have realplayer packaged for your distro.

I just followed the link which Helix gave me and (tried to) install the RPM package.

Quote:

Totem will play basic mpegs out-of-the-box (although I'd suggest mplayer for all your media playing goodness - apologies to xine fans out there :) ) but many distros are afraid to distribute codec packs because of legal issues (for memory Red Hat didn't even ship mp3 capabilities becuase of patent issues) - generally codec packs are available from package repositories that are hosted in jurisdictions with saner IP laws.


Totem wouldn't play any of the MPEGs I tried, which admittidly wasn't many, I just gave up. I did try out MPlayer last time I used Linux, and I have to say I was pretty impressed by it. Damned Thompson and their grip on the MPEG standard, why can't everyone use Oggs or something else?

Quote:

If you are annoyed by this situation then a letter to your local MP outlining why software patents are wrong is about the best you can do.


I think Michael Furgusson is too busy inviting the Pope to come and play and convincing us that selling a (norti) money making asset like Tel$tra is a good thing.

Quote:

Yep, it is pretty but I'm afraid I'm going to have to disagree with you on the problems front. Software installation using package managers is painless. There are tons of software repositories out there with practically everything you need. Synaptic, YUM, urpmi and the venerable apt-get make life extremely easy on the software installation front (for memory, Fedora comes with Synaptic as its package manager). If you were using rpm on the command-line to install packages you were using the wrong tool for the job - rpm is for installing/uninstalling and managing distro packages - its is very bad at doing anything else, thats why package managers are used to install third party stuff.


As I said before I couldnt find any sort of package manager in the menus or in the Run Program command. I did try using yum without any sucess. I did have the idea of adding KDE so as to get Kpackage and see if that helped, but I haven't got around to it yet. I just prefer Gnome cos it looks nicer

Quote:

The problem you identified with the network card - well, basically there was not really an error, the wrong netwrok card was selected. You noted that you assumed that eth0 would be assigned to the correct card - 1st rule of computers: assume nothing. I've had plenty of grief with Windows selecting the wrong card, disabling cards for no apparent reason and just generally being a PIA about networking, so Linux is not alone :) I think these are just platform independent problems. That being said, many of the desktop distros do have network indicator applets - Mandriva has one installed by default which is kind of like the windows taskbar icons for networking.


I think the first rule should be to assume I am an idiot. Although in my defence the error messages I was getting was something like 'connection refused by host'. To me at least that suggests that for some reason my modem wasn't liking the HTTP request it was recieving and therefore rejecting it, not that the request wasn't really being sent at all. I would have also thought that some sort of notification icon would have been added by default, and I haven't yet found where to add one myself.

Quote:

The problem with 'firstboot' - well, it fixed itself on reboot. How many times is this the fix for a problem on any platform :) ? Thankfully 99% of the time on linux when an app stops working its a matter of restarting the service rather than the whole box, but sometimes a restart is the only way.


True, however it was very disappointing that it didn't get pass this stage without a problem.

Quote:

The problem with media players? well, Media players will always be a problem on Linux until sanity prevails in the IP field. This is not a linux problem, its a political/legal one. That being said, with the right codecs installed I've never had a file that mplayer can't play.


OKies I shall give MPlayer a go

Quote:

As far as your choice of distro - I'd go for a more desktop oriented one: Kubuntu (or ubuntu) or Mandriva - Fedora is more workstation oriented, but its by no means a bad choice.


Yep I am going to put Ubanutu on next, just a soon as I get a CD to burn the ISO to.

Quote:

Hope all that helps, remember ranting doesn't usually get you much help in any community but asking good questions does.


Yes it certainly does. Sorry if I came off a little strong, I just got on a role and was a tad stressed by all the hair that I had pulled out during the day.. and as you can see by the time of my post, it was late

Thanks for you're help

Cheers
Threaded | Newest First Previous Topic | Next Topic | Top

Register To Post